Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology · Aug 2025
John C. Middlebrooks, Matthew L. Richardson, Robert P. Carlyon, Harrison W. Lin
Abstract
Purpose Present-day cochlear implants (CIs) can deliver usable speech reception in quiet surroundings. Most CI users, however, show impaired sensitivity to temporal fine structure, which hampers their use of pitch contours and spatial cues to segregate competing talkers. In previous short-term animal studies, we used intraneural (IN) electrodes to stimulate pathways originating from various cochlear turns. Neurons in the inferior colliculus synchronized to apical stimulation at higher rates than to stimulation of the middle-to-basal pathways that are stimulated primarily by today’s CIs. Here, we use non-invasive recordings to test the safety and efficacy of up to 6 months of IN implantation and stimulation in cats. Methods Deafened cats (ten female, two male) were implanted with IN and/or conventional CI electrodes. The IN electrodes were single activated-iridium shanks that targeted apical-turn fibers. Scalp recordings were made from sedated animals at 2–3-week intervals. Auditory brainstem responses to single electrical pulses (eABR) tracked sensitivity and growth of responses. Frequency following responses to electrical pulse trains (eFFR) assessed brainstem temporal transmission at varying pulse rates. Results Thresholds for eABR were lower for IN than for CI stimulation, dynamic ranges were wider, and (by inference) spread of activation was more restricted. The eFFR evaluated at latencies comparable to those of inferior-colliculus spikes synchronized at maximum pulse rates averaging > 360 pulses/s for IN compared to ~ 240 pulses/s for CI stimulation. The eABR thresholds and eFFR cutoff rates were stable out to 6 months after implantation. Conclusions The results demonstrate the safety and efficacy of chronic IN stimulation in an animal model. In a future clinical device, an IN electrode could augment cochlear-implant performance by enhancing temporal acuity, thereby improving speech reception amid competing sounds.
PLOS Biology · Jul 2025
D. Walker Gauthier, Noelle James, Benjamin D. Auerbach
Abstract
Atypical sensory processing, particularly in the auditory domain, is one of the most common and quality-of-life affecting symptoms seen in autism spectrum disorders (ASD). Fragile X Syndrome (FXS) is a leading inherited cause of ASD and a majority of FXS individuals present with auditory processing alterations. While auditory hypersensitivity is a common phenotype observed in FXS and Fmr1 knockout (KO) rodent models, it is important to consider other auditory coding impairments that could contribute to sound processing difficulties and disrupted language comprehension in FXS. We have shown previously that a Fmr1 KO rat model of FXS exhibits heightened sound sensitivity that coincided with abnormal perceptual integration of stimulus bandwidth, indicative of altered spectral processing. Frequency discrimination is a fundamental aspect of sound encoding that is important for a range of auditory processes, such as source segregation and speech comprehension, and disrupted frequency coding could thus contribute to a range of auditory issues in FXS and ASD. Here we explicitly characterized spectral processing deficits in male Fmr1 KO rats using an operant conditioning tone discrimination assay and in vivo electrophysiological recordings from the auditory cortex and inferior colliculus. We found that Fmr1 KO rats exhibited poorer frequency resolution, which corresponded with neuronal hyperactivity and broader frequency tuning in auditory cortical but not collicular neurons. Using an experimentally informed population model, we show that these cortical physiological differences can recapitulate the observed behavior discrimination deficits, with decoder performance being tightly linked to differences in cortical tuning width and signal-to-noise ratios. Together, these findings indicate that cortical hyperexcitability in Fmr1 KO rats may act to preserve signal-to-noise ratios and signal detection threshold at the expense of sound sensitivity and fine feature discrimination, highlighting a potential mechanistic locus for a range of auditory behavioral phenotypes in FXS.
Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology · May 2025
Matthew L. Richardson, Robert P. Carlyon, Harrison W. Lin, John C. Middlebrooks
Abstract
Purpose Present-day cochlear-implant (CI) users can achieve high levels of speech reception in quiet surroundings. Nevertheless, sensitivity to the temporal pitch of sounds is limited, which contributes to deficits in speech reception amid multiple talkers and in appreciation of musical melodies. Short-term, invasive neurophysiological studies in animals have demonstrated limitations in neural phase locking in the tonotopic range of the auditory pathway that is activated by CIs. It remains an open question, however, whether those neural limitations can account for perceptual deficits in those animal species, let alone in human CI users. For that reason, we have evaluated non-invasive recordings of phase locking from cats chronically implanted with a CI. Methods Ten deafened cats (eight female) were implanted with an animal version of a clinical CI array. The electrically evoked frequency following response (eFFRs) was recorded from the scalps of sedated animals at ≥ 10 weeks post-implantation. Stimuli consisted of constant-amplitude electrical pulse trains at rates from ~ 40 to 640 pulses per second. Results Recordings of the eFFR demonstrated robust responses synchronized to electrical pulse trains across all stimulus rates. Analyses of eFFR amplitude and phase transfer functions confirmed that the eFFR, as with its normal-hearing counterpart, originates from multiple subcortical and cortical generators. The slopes of segments of eFFR phase transfer functions revealed stimulus-to-response latencies of generators that dominated the eFFR across restricted ranges of pulse rates. Those rate ranges must coincide with the limits of phase locking by putative generators at successive levels of the auditory neuroaxis and could inform our understanding of the limits to perceptual temporal acuity. Conclusion The eFFR demonstrated here in an animal model provides a valuable non-invasive measure of temporal processing in electric cochlear stimulation that can be related to ongoing perceptual measures in the same animals and is well-suited to evaluate novel modes of auditory prosthesis for enhancing temporal acuity.