Cochlear implants (CIs) have successfully restored hearing in more than one million patients with severe to profound hearing loss worldwide. Although CIs effectively restore speech perception in quiet environments, sound localization remains challenging for bilateral CI users, particularly their ability to utilize interaural time differences (ITDs). The majority of clinical CI processors use a coding strategy that encodes ITD information only in the envelope of electrical pulse trains rather than their pulse timing, which may contribute to the poorer spatial hearing perception of CI users. We recently demonstrated in a behavioural study on early deafened, bilaterally CI‐implanted rats that pulse timing ITDs completely dominate ITD perception, whereas sensitivity to envelope ITDs is almost negligible in comparison. Building on this, we here investigated the neurophysiological sensitivity of the inferior colliculus (IC) to envelope and pulse timing ITDs at two different pulse rates (900 and 4500 pulses/s) and three different stimulation modulations (5, 20 and 100 Hz) in CI rats with different hearing experiences. Our results indicate that IC neurons exhibit far greater sensitivity to pulse timing ITD than envelope ITD independent of pulse rate, modulation rate or hearing experience. These findings suggest that to improve binaural hearing outcomes in bilateral CI users, clinical stimulation strategies should provide informative pulse timing ITDs. image Key points Current bilateral cochlear implants mostly provide time cues of arriving sound in the envelope of stimulation rather than in the timing of pulses. A behavioural study on cochlear implanted rats has shown that pulse timing dominates binaural hearing. Here we examined the neural sensitivity to independent changes in time cues presented on the envelope or pulse timing, respectively, in rats with bilateral cochlear implants and different hearing experiences. Auditory midbrain neurons were consistently more sensitive to changes in pulse timing rather than envelope, irrespective of stimulus pulse rate, modulation rate or an animal's hearing experience.
Cochlear Implants (CI) are an effective neuroprosthesis for humans with profound hearing loss, enabling deaf adults to have phone calls without lipreading and babies to have successful language development. However, CIs have significant limitations in complex hearing situations, motivating the need for further research, including studies in animal models. Here, we demonstrate the usefulness of wide field Ca++ imaging in assessing different CI stimulation strategies. One major challenge in electrophysiology in CI animals lies in excluding the CI electric artifacts from the recording, since they are orders of magnitude larger than the amplitude of action potentials. Also, electrophysiology can rarely sample large areas of neuropil at high spatial resolution. To circumvent these problems, we have set up an imaging system allowing us to monitor neural activity in the auditory cortex (AC) of CI supplied rats using the Ca++ sensitive dye OGB. Here we describe an initial experiment with this setup, in which we recorded cortical responses to 4 different stimulation patterns which were delivered across 3 CI channels to the contralateral ear. We then investigated two parameters that have been shown to affect intelligibility in CI users: pulse rate and relative pulse timing across CI channels. While pulse rate had only a very modest effect on the discriminability of the neural responses, the stimulation mode had a major effect, with simultaneous pulse timing, perhaps surprisingly, allowing much better pattern discrimination than interleaved sampling. The result suggests that allowing collisions of pulses on neighboring channels may not always be detrimental, at least if partial overlaps of pulses, in which anodic and cathodic pulse phases might cancel, are avoided.
Spatial hearing in cochlear implant (CI) patients remains a major challenge, with many early deaf users reported to have no measurable sensitivity to interaural time differences (ITDs). Deprivation of binaural experience during an early critical period is often hypothesized to be the cause of this shortcoming. However, we show that neonatally deafened (ND) rats provided with precisely synchronized CI stimulation in adulthood can be trained to lateralize ITDs with essentially normal behavioral thresholds near 50 μs. Furthermore, comparable ND rats show high physiological sensitivity to ITDs immediately after binaural implantation in adulthood. Our result that ND-CI rats achieved very good behavioral ITD thresholds, while prelingually deaf human CI patients often fail to develop a useful sensitivity to ITD raises urgent questions concerning the possibility that shortcomings in technology or treatment, rather than missing input during early development, may be behind the usually poor binaural outcomes for current CI patients.
