Optogenetics publications

Across sensory modalities, peripheral deafferentation can induce maladaptive central plasticity that amplifies sensory responses while distorting affective processing, rendering innocuous stimuli unpleasant, intrusive, or even painful. Here, we examined the affective dimension of compensatory plasticity in a mouse model of hyperacusis by introducing noise-induced focal cochlear lesions and tracking maladaptive plasticity in the lateral amygdala (LA), a key limbic hub for sensory-affective valuation. Whereas control mice habituated to neutral sounds, mice with noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) showed sustained LA hyperresponsivity and abnormally strong temporal coupling between calcium transients and pupil dilations, an autonomic index of arousal. NIHL also disrupted discriminative auditory threat learning, producing poorly selective, non-extinguishing enhancement of LA responses and freezing to both threatening and non-threatening sounds. We posited that potentiating inhibition in the higher-order auditory cortex (HO-AC), a prominent source of auditory sensory input to the LA, could reinstate normal affective sound processing after NIHL. Brief bouts of 40-Hz optogenetic activation of HO-AC parvalbumin-expressing inhibitory neurons (PVNs) durably reversed LA sensitization, normalized pupil-indexed arousal dynamics, and reinstated discriminative auditory threat memory. These findings identify cortical inhibitory potentiation as a strategy for reversing neural, autonomic, and behavioral signatures of distorted affective sound processing after peripheral sensory injury.

Parvalbumin-expressing inhibitory neurons (PVNs) stabilize cortical network activity, generate gamma rhythms, and regulate experience-dependent plasticity. We found that PVNs act like a volume knob in the mouse auditory cortex (ACtx), bi-directionally adjusting neural and perceptual sensitivity to sound level over a 20 dB range. PVN-based gain adjustments were "sticky," such that a single bout of PVN activation at 40 Hz-but not at 1 or 70 Hz-sustainably dampened ACtx sound responsiveness, enhanced feedforward inhibition, and behaviorally desensitized mice to loudness. We then developed a mouse model of adult-onset hyperacusis by demonstrating ACtx hyperactivity, PVN hypofunction, and loudness hypersensitivity following a restricted noise-induced cochlear lesion. We found that several minutes of 40-Hz PVN stimulation in noise-exposed mice sustainably dampened ACtx hyperactivity and restored normal loudness sensitivity for 1 week. These findings demonstrate that sensory disorders caused by permanent peripheral injuries can be reversed by patterned stimulation of cortical circuits that directly regulate perception.

Basal forebrain cholinergic neurons (BFCNs) densely innervate auditory cortex (ACtx), conveying signals linked to internal brain states and external sensory cues. Acetylcholine (ACh) is known to rapidly modulate cortical circuits through nicotinic ACh receptor (nAChR)-mediated activation of layer 1 inhibitory neurons (L1-INs). However, BFCN terminals are also abundant in deeper layers, where their functional impact has received less attention. Using multi-plex in situ labeling across cortical layers and cell types, we found that layer 6 pyramidal neurons (L6-PNs) are highly enriched in diverse transcripts for nAChR subunits and muscarinic ACh receptors (mAChRs). In vivo optogenetic activation of BFCN axons revealed persistent modulation of regular spiking units in L2-6 but a rapid phasic activation only in L6. In acute slices, optogenetic activation of BFCN axons elicited fast nAChR-mediated excitatory post-synaptic potentials in L6-PNs, comparable to responses in L1-INs, and slower mAChR-mediated inhibitory responses. These findings identify L1-INs and excitatory L6-PNs as two major hubs for BFCN modulation of cortical circuits. By recruiting distinct receptor mechanisms and circuit motifs in L1 and L6, BFCNs may engage parallel pathways of cholinergic control that couple fast, transient modulation with slower, sustained regulation to shape cortical perception and plasticity.

The central nervous system controls movement by combining neuromotor modules, known as muscle synergies. Previous studies suggest that spinal premotor interneurons (PreM‐INs) contribute to the encoding of stable muscle synergies for voluntary movement. But descending and sensory inputs also influence motor outputs through the spinal interneuronal network, which may be configured by its inputs to encode different sets of muscle synergies depending on the network state, thereby recruiting different selections of synergies. Here we tested this possibility of state‐dependent synergy encoding by examining the muscle synergies represented by the same upstream spinal interneurons under different activity states induced by various optogenetic stimulation patterns. Lumbosacral spinal units and electromyographic (EMG) activities of hindlimb muscles were simultaneously recorded from anaesthetized Thy1‐ChR2 mice as the spinal cord was stimulated by one or two optic fibres at different intensities. The synergy encoded by each unit was revealed as a ‘muscle field’ derived from spike‐triggered averages of EMG, whereas the entire muscle synergy set was factorized from the EMG. We found that although the muscle synergy set remained stable across stimulation conditions, the muscle fields of the same units were matched to different synergies within the set in different states. Thus the interneurons may flexibly adjust their connectivity with the motoneurons of the muscles as descending and sensory afferents impose different states on the spinal network. State‐dependent encoding of muscle synergies may allow different synergies to be selected for producing stable movement in an ever‐changing workspace environment. image Key points Muscle synergies for locomotion can be represented by spinal interneurons, as revealed by the interneurons’ muscle fields derived from spike‐triggered averages of EMG. The muscle field of a single spinal interneuron may vary under different stimulation conditions, as demonstrated by optogenetic stimulation. Encoding of muscle synergies is dependent on the state of spinal activities, thus facilitating the selection of appropriate synergies in different dynamic environments.