Open Research Europe · Sep 2025
Régis Trapeau, Luc Renaud, Melina Cordeau, … Pascal Belin
Abstract
We investigated the auditory responses of anesthetized rhesus macaques to complex natural sounds using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and a near-awake anesthesia protocol combining low-dose sevoflurane and dexmedetomidine. Eleven animals were scanned while listening to macaque vocalizations and non-vocal sounds. Robust activation was observed in primary and belt auditory cortices as well as subcortical structures, indicating preserved auditory responsiveness under anesthesia. However, unlike in awake animals, selective responses to vocalizations in anterior temporal voice areas (aTVAs) were absent. Instead, vocalization sensitivity emerged in the ventral premotor cortex, prefrontal cortex, and posterior middle temporal gyrus, regions associated with the dorsal auditory stream and multisensory integration. These findings suggest that while anesthesia preserves basic auditory processing, it modulates higher-order cortical responses involved in voice perception. Anesthetized fMRI thus offers a valuable tool for large-scale studies of primary auditory functions, while it must be approached with caution when studying higher-order auditory functions.
Scientific Reports · May 2024
Yoshiki Matsuda, Nobuyuki Ozawa, Takiko Shinozaki, … Toshikazu Shinba
Abstract
Anticipating positive outcomes is a core cognitive function in the process of reward prediction. However, no neurophysiological method objectively assesses reward prediction in basic medical research. In the present study, we established a physiological paradigm using cortical direct current (DC) potential responses in rats to assess reward prediction. This paradigm consisted of five daily 1-h sessions with two tones, wherein the rewarded tone was followed by electrical stimulation of the medial forebrain bundle (MFB) scheduled at 1000 ms later, whereas the unrewarded tone was not. On day 1, both tones induced a negative DC shift immediately after auditory responses, persisting up to MFB stimulation. This negative shift progressively increased and peaked on day 4. Starting from day 3, the negative shift from 600 to 1000 ms was significantly larger following the rewarded tone than that following the unrewarded tone. This negative DC shift was particularly prominent in the frontal cortex, suggesting its crucial role in discriminative reward prediction. During the extinction sessions, the shift diminished significantly on extinction day 1. These findings suggest that cortical DC potential is related to reward prediction and could be a valuable tool for evaluating animal models of depression, providing a testing system for anhedonia.
bioRxiv · Nov 2019
Stephen M. Town, Katherine C. Wood, Jennifer K. Bizley
Abstract
The ability to recognize sounds in noise is a key part of hearing, and the mechanisms by which the brain identifies sounds in noise are of considerable interest to scientists, clinicians and engineers. Yet we know little about the necessity of regions such as auditory cortex for hearing in noise, or how cortical processing of sounds is adversely affected by noise. Here we used reversible cortical inactivation and extracellular electrophysiology in ferrets performing a vowel discrimination task to identify and understand the causal contribution of auditory cortex to hearing in noise. Cortical inactivation by cooling impaired task performance in noisy but not clean conditions, while responses of auditory cortical neurons were less informative about vowel identity in noise. Simulations mimicking cortical inactivation indicated that effects of inactivation were related to the loss of information about sounds represented across neural populations. The addition of noise to target sounds drove spiking activity in auditory cortex and recruitment of additional neural populations that were linked to degraded behavioral performance. To suppress noise-related activity, we used continuous exposure to background noise to adapt the auditory system and recover behavioral performance in both ferrets and humans. Inactivation by cooling revealed that the benefits of continuous exposure were not cortically dependent. Together our results highlight the importance of auditory cortex in sound discrimination in noise and the underlying mechanisms through which noise-related activity and adaptation shape hearing.
Frontiers in Neuroscience · Feb 2016
Hsin-I Liao, Makoto Yoneya, Shunsuke Kidani, … Shigeto Furukawa
Abstract
A unique sound that deviates from a repetitive background sound induces signature neural responses, such as mismatch negativity and novelty P3 response in electro-encephalography studies. Here we show that a deviant auditory stimulus induces a human pupillary dilation response (PDR) that is sensitive to the stimulus properties and irrespective whether attention is directed to the sounds or not. In an auditory oddball sequence, we used white noise and 2000-Hz tones as oddballs against repeated 1000-Hz tones. Participants' pupillary responses were recorded while they listened to the auditory oddball sequence. In Experiment 1, they were not involved in any task. Results show that pupils dilated to the noise oddballs for approximately 4 s, but no such PDR was found for the 2000-Hz tone oddballs. In Experiments 2, two types of visual oddballs were presented synchronously with the auditory oddballs. Participants discriminated the auditory or visual oddballs while trying to ignore stimuli from the other modality. The purpose of this manipulation was to direct attention to or away from the auditory sequence. In Experiment 3, the visual oddballs and the auditory oddballs were always presented asynchronously to prevent residuals of attention on to-be-ignored oddballs due to the concurrence with the attended oddballs. Results show that pupils dilated to both the noise and 2000-Hz tone oddballs in all conditions. Most importantly, PDRs to noise were larger than those to the 2000-Hz tone oddballs regardless of the attention condition in both experiments. The overall results suggest that the stimulus-dependent factor of the PDR appears to be independent of attention.