Auditory Research publications

Normally hearing humans can localize sound sources quite accurately, with minimum audible angles as small as 1°. To achieve this, these auditory pathways combine information from multiple acoustic cues, including interaural time and interaural level differences (ITDs and ILDs). Patients relying on cochlear implants (CIs) to hear the world do not match normal performance. These deficits are most pronounced in patients with little or no hearing experience early in life, and they appear to result from impaired sensitivity to ITDs, but not to ILDs. However, little is known about how ITD and ILD sensitivities develop and interact in an early deafened auditory system shortly after CI implantation. Neonatally deafened rats were fitted with bilateral CIs, and, providing informative ITDs and ILDs from stimulation onset, were trained to lateralize CI stimuli. These animals are exquisitely sensitive to both ILDs and ITDs of CI stimulus pulses, and combined information from both cues in a weighted sum. Importantly, ITDs are weighted heavily in the CI rats, such that only very modest ITDs pointing in one direction can confound quite large ILDs pointing in the opposite direction. This underlines the importance of informative ITDs for maximizing the potential for spatial hearing with CI devices.

Purpose Present-day cochlear implants (CIs) can deliver usable speech reception in quiet surroundings. Most CI users, however, show impaired sensitivity to temporal fine structure, which hampers their use of pitch contours and spatial cues to segregate competing talkers. In previous short-term animal studies, we used intraneural (IN) electrodes to stimulate pathways originating from various cochlear turns. Neurons in the inferior colliculus synchronized to apical stimulation at higher rates than to stimulation of the middle-to-basal pathways that are stimulated primarily by today’s CIs. Here, we use non-invasive recordings to test the safety and efficacy of up to 6 months of IN implantation and stimulation in cats. Methods Deafened cats (ten female, two male) were implanted with IN and/or conventional CI electrodes. The IN electrodes were single activated-iridium shanks that targeted apical-turn fibers. Scalp recordings were made from sedated animals at 2–3-week intervals. Auditory brainstem responses to single electrical pulses (eABR) tracked sensitivity and growth of responses. Frequency following responses to electrical pulse trains (eFFR) assessed brainstem temporal transmission at varying pulse rates. Results Thresholds for eABR were lower for IN than for CI stimulation, dynamic ranges were wider, and (by inference) spread of activation was more restricted. The eFFR evaluated at latencies comparable to those of inferior-colliculus spikes synchronized at maximum pulse rates averaging > 360 pulses/s for IN compared to ~ 240 pulses/s for CI stimulation. The eABR thresholds and eFFR cutoff rates were stable out to 6 months after implantation. Conclusions The results demonstrate the safety and efficacy of chronic IN stimulation in an animal model. In a future clinical device, an IN electrode could augment cochlear-implant performance by enhancing temporal acuity, thereby improving speech reception amid competing sounds.

Purpose Present-day cochlear-implant (CI) users can achieve high levels of speech reception in quiet surroundings. Nevertheless, sensitivity to the temporal pitch of sounds is limited, which contributes to deficits in speech reception amid multiple talkers and in appreciation of musical melodies. Short-term, invasive neurophysiological studies in animals have demonstrated limitations in neural phase locking in the tonotopic range of the auditory pathway that is activated by CIs. It remains an open question, however, whether those neural limitations can account for perceptual deficits in those animal species, let alone in human CI users. For that reason, we have evaluated non-invasive recordings of phase locking from cats chronically implanted with a CI. Methods Ten deafened cats (eight female) were implanted with an animal version of a clinical CI array. The electrically evoked frequency following response (eFFRs) was recorded from the scalps of sedated animals at ≥ 10 weeks post-implantation. Stimuli consisted of constant-amplitude electrical pulse trains at rates from ~ 40 to 640 pulses per second. Results Recordings of the eFFR demonstrated robust responses synchronized to electrical pulse trains across all stimulus rates. Analyses of eFFR amplitude and phase transfer functions confirmed that the eFFR, as with its normal-hearing counterpart, originates from multiple subcortical and cortical generators. The slopes of segments of eFFR phase transfer functions revealed stimulus-to-response latencies of generators that dominated the eFFR across restricted ranges of pulse rates. Those rate ranges must coincide with the limits of phase locking by putative generators at successive levels of the auditory neuroaxis and could inform our understanding of the limits to perceptual temporal acuity. Conclusion The eFFR demonstrated here in an animal model provides a valuable non-invasive measure of temporal processing in electric cochlear stimulation that can be related to ongoing perceptual measures in the same animals and is well-suited to evaluate novel modes of auditory prosthesis for enhancing temporal acuity.

Bilateral cochlear implant (CI) patients exhibit significant limitations in spatial hearing. Their ability to process interaural time differences (ITDs) is often impaired, while their ability to process interaural level differences (ILDs) remains comparatively good. Clinical studies aiming to identify the causes of these limitations are often plagued by confounds and ethical limitations. Recent behavioral work suggests that rats may be a good animal model for studying binaural hearing under neuroprosthetic stimulation, as rats develop excellent ITD sensitivity when provided with suitable CI stimulation. However, their ability to use ILDs has not yet been characterized. Objective of this study is to address this knowledge gap. Neontally deafened rats were bilaterally fitted with CIs, and trained to lateralize binaural stimuli according to ILD. Their behavioral ILD thresholds were measured at pulse rates from 50 to 2400 pps. CI rats exhibited high sensitivity to ILDs with thresholds of a few dB at all tested pulse rates. We conclude that early deafened rats develop good sensitivity, not only to ITDs but also to ILDs, if provided with appropriate CI stimulation. Their generally good performance, in line with expectations from other mammalian species, validates rats as an excellent model for research on binaural auditory prostheses.

Objective: Intuitive control of conventional prostheses is hampered by their inability to provide the real-time tactile and proprioceptive feedback of natural sensory pathways. The macro-sieve electrode (MSE) is a candidate interface to amputees’ truncated peripheral nerves for introducing sensory feedback from external sensors to facilitate prosthetic control. Its unique geometry enables selective control of the complete nerve cross-section by current steering. Unlike previously studied interfaces that target intact nerve, the MSE’s implantation requires transection and subsequent regeneration of the target nerve. Therefore, a key determinant of the MSE’s suitability for this task is whether it can elicit sensory percepts at low current levels in the face of altered morphology and caliber distribution inherent to axon regeneration. The present in vivo study describes a combined rat sciatic nerve and behavioral model developed to answer this question. Approach: Rats learned a go/no-go detection task using auditory stimuli and then underwent surgery to implant the MSE in the sciatic nerve. After healing, they were trained with monopolar electrical stimuli with one multi-channel and eight single-channel stimulus configurations. Psychometric curves derived by the method of constant stimuli (MCS) were used to calculate 50% detection thresholds and associated psychometric slopes. Thresholds and slopes were calculated at two time points 3 weeks apart. Main Results: For the multi-channel stimulus configuration, the average current required for stimulus detection was 19.37 μA (3.87 nC) per channel. Single-channel thresholds for leads located near the nerve’s center were, on average, half those of leads located near the periphery (54.92 μA vs. 110.71 μA, or 10.98 nC vs. 22.14 nC). Longitudinally, 3 of 5 leads’ thresholds decreased or remained stable over the 3-week span. The remaining two leads’ thresholds increased by 70–74%, possibly due to scarring or device failure. Significance: This work represents an important first step in establishing the MSE’s viability as a sensory feedback interface. It further lays the groundwork for future experiments that will extend this model to the study of other devices, stimulus parameters, and task paradigms.

Neural implants that deliver multi-site electrical stimulation to the nervous systems are no longer the last resort but routine treatment options for various neurological disorders. Multi-site electrical stimulation is also widely used to study nervous system function and neural circuit transformations. These technologies increasingly demand dynamic electrical stimulation and closed-loop feedback control for real-time assessment of neural function, which is technically challenging since stimulus-evoked artifacts overwhelm the small neural signals of interest. We report a novel and versatile artifact removal method that can be applied in a variety of settings, from single- to multi-site stimulation and recording and for current waveforms of arbitrary shape and size. The method capitalizes on linear electrical coupling between stimulating currents and recording artifacts, which allows us to estimate a multi-channel linear Wiener filter to predict and subsequently remove artifacts via subtraction. We confirm and verify the linearity assumption and demonstrate feasibility in a variety of recording modalities, including in vitro sciatic nerve stimulation, bilateral cochlear implant stimulation, and multi-channel stimulation and recording between the auditory midbrain and cortex. We demonstrate a vast enhancement in the recording quality with a typical artifact reduction of 25-40 dB. The method is efficient and can be scaled to arbitrary number of stimulus and recording sites, making it ideal for applications in large-scale arrays, closed-loop implants, and high-resolution multi-channel brain-machine interfaces.